-
25th October 2024, 01:28 #21
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 2,759
- Like
- 6
- Liked 348 Times in 192 Posts
-
25th October 2024, 06:48 #22
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Greenwich, London UK
- Posts
- 3,583
- Like
- 16
- Liked 805 Times in 666 Posts
Ha ha, with a beard, spectacles and an odd limp, no one would be wiser it is him. To be serious though, a lot of people are not comfortable with the current steward arrangement in F1. So it is not a conspiracy theory, it is a situation where it is perceived that the stewarding decision may be unfairly impacting the driver's championship outcome in subtle but obvious ways. We saw this a lot in 2021, so we know what we are looking at don't we?
Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
William Shakespeare
-
26th October 2024, 05:58 #23
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Greenwich, London UK
- Posts
- 3,583
- Like
- 16
- Liked 805 Times in 666 Posts
Read this article to see why the steward's decision was correctly applied to Norris.
https://medium.com/motor-racing/the-...e-0fac2f0fbab5Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
William Shakespeare
-
28th October 2024, 01:53 #24
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 2,759
- Like
- 6
- Liked 348 Times in 192 Posts
This is my point. Using extra weight to slow a more powerful (electric) car is too crude as the extra weight also has to be braked and rotated. It would be better if they made the same power and...
World Rallycross Championship...