Results 11 to 17 of 17
-
24th June 2024, 16:27 #11
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,442
- Like
- 548
- Liked 799 Times in 592 Posts
-
24th June 2024, 19:07 #12
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Greenwich, London UK
- Posts
- 3,520
- Like
- 16
- Liked 799 Times in 661 Posts
-
25th June 2024, 05:12 #13
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Posts
- 6,188
- Like
- 673
- Liked 716 Times in 502 Posts
Yet your opinion has changed quite a bit since Canada, where you seemed certain there was a conspiracy against Lewis by the team. And further implied that "we can all see it". Speaking for others is obviously casting a shadow on anyone not in line with your thinking, yet it was done.
When all reality is cast aside, it's hard to take such opinions as valid and not reject them. Drivers and teams all have up and down days, weeks, seasons at times. George beat Lewis in Canada, it's really that simple. It doesn't require mental gymnastics to realize at some point almost every driver will be beaten by the other driver within their team.
I don't think it's cool to claim to know what others think, they are allowed to express that themselves. But part of any dialogue/discussion/debate is people backing up their views with evidence, so that others can take those views as more well informed. Without any evidence to support a view, it's just another opinion subject to being questions as is often the case.
- Likes: Bagwan (26th June 2024)
-
25th June 2024, 07:57 #14
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Greenwich, London UK
- Posts
- 3,520
- Like
- 16
- Liked 799 Times in 661 Posts
As usual, you miss the point by a country mile. The dialogue was not about whether or not Russell did or did not beat Hamilton. Nor was it about whether he is able to beat Hamilton. I personally see Russell as a future driver's world champion in the making.
The dialogue was simply about whether Hamilton was getting adequate support and information to allow him to produce his best possible performances.
Since you prefer to make jibes at the author rather than discuss the issue, please do not bother to respond as l shall not read your responses henceforth.Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
William Shakespeare
-
26th June 2024, 14:51 #15
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,442
- Like
- 548
- Liked 799 Times in 592 Posts
- Likes: airshifter (27th June 2024)
-
26th June 2024, 14:53 #16
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,442
- Like
- 548
- Liked 799 Times in 592 Posts
-
27th June 2024, 15:38 #17
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Posts
- 6,188
- Like
- 673
- Liked 716 Times in 502 Posts
Your post claimed that the "proof" that the team messed with Hamilton's car was simply that he didn't come within a tenth of George, direct comparison. And nobody missed that 2016 was brought up... the team is suspicious because Nico got the title.
Neither was a jibe, just pointing out reality. If you choose not to deal with the reality of what you posted then by all means run from the discussion rather than communicate more clearly.
Since Lewis has generally had better race pace, one could just as easily claim they are sabotaging George by setting his car up for qually rather than the race. The reality is that the drivers and their side of the pit wall makes the best educated decisions they can based on the conditions they expect, and as humans they can all sometimes get it wrong.
- Likes: Bagwan (28th June 2024)
Yes he was driving MRF
Martins Sesks