Thread: Btcc 2016
-
1st August 2016, 12:55 #11
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Birmingham, UK
- Posts
- 3,230
- Like
- 1
- Liked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Taller barriers would help, but perhaps the positioning of the camera stand needs to be considered too. It's an MSV circuit, and they do tend to be pretty hot on these things, so if there need to be changes they will be made quickly.
There might be something in the driving standards criticism too though. I would never criticise a championship for having too many cars, but perhaps in filling a grid of 30+ there are a few drivers who might be advised to go and race somewhere else. None of the crashes happened towards the front of the field after all... I think it was Jordan who said the same people seem to get caught in the incidents, and he's right on yesterday's evidence (although I think Hunter Abbott can be considered unlucky). I don't think the BTCC's reputation for crashes helps; it's been a while since we saw anything like yesterday's carnage, let alone twice in one meeting, but when contact is accepted these things are bound to happen sooner or later. Unfortunately we didn't get a proper view of what triggered the accident, so it's difficult to apportion blame or suggest what needs to be done as a result.
I don't think the Clio pit board incident really needs any changes other than: Make sure you move your pit board out of the way of oncoming traffic. Certainly there's not a lot they can do to relocate the pit wall.
A lucky escape though for all concerned; if Abbott's car had been sent right rather than left it could have gone over the pit wall. Similarly, while it was unfortunate the camera stand got hit, if it hadn't been there could we have had a car in the crowd?https://wordpress.com/stats/insights/stugrovesf1.wordpress.com
-
1st August 2016, 13:07 #12
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Posts
- 171
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It was good to see no spectators were injured!!
-
1st August 2016, 21:02 #13
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 19,105
- Like
- 9
- Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
Indeed. As for what those changes should be, if it's not deemed a suitable site for a camera stand, I'd say that area ought not to contain any spectators either, unless a tall fence is put in.
Yes, I agree. It's a shame, because the driving standards at the front of the field have generally been excellent in the last few seasons — certainly, much better than the 2004-06 period, which was the lowest point I can recall. They were very good yesterday, too, Morgan's constant punting of Shedden in race two aside.
I'd add that, generally, we see far fewer big pile-ups than used to be the case in the early-to-mid-1990s, when the field was full of professional drivers. Generally there was at least one a season back then — Snetterton 1993, Silverstone GP 1994 and Brands 1996 spring to mind.
Jordan is right — it is the same few drivers getting caught up, race after race. Respect to him for saying so in public. Alex Martin seems to be a liability. Ollie Jackson isn't much better. Mark Howard and Kelvin Fletcher seem to go off-track at most meetings, but their mishaps don't tend to involve other drivers.
There is a YouTube clip showing the race two crash from a slightly better angle, though you still don't see the whole thing. Welch didn't seem to do anything to justify Jackson running into him, but it would be unfair to apportion blame on this basis. In both cases, a look at the TOCA driving standards camera footage would certainly be instructive...
Or erect a wire debris fence on the pit wall.
Very definitely. It certainly makes me think that a rolling start really isn't the answer; that same incident would still have happened, but with the cars at a higher speed.
-
1st August 2016, 21:03 #14
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 19,105
- Like
- 9
- Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
'Unsustainable' run of damage leaves Williams uncertain of car spec for Vegas. Williams is evaluating its spares situation after series of crashes has left it short after the Brazilian GP. Nov 7,...
2024 Formula 1 Preview &...