Results 1 to 10 of 374

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,502
    Like
    4
    Liked 314 Times in 170 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by HKSjbg View Post
    Well I think for once the new BRC season has lived up to the hype - we couldn’t reasonably expect much better than a former ERC champion and last year’s JWRC champion, among other high calibre entrants.

    And everybody seemed happy enough doing 100 forestry kilometres last weekend so it might not be out of the realms of possibility that next year or the year after there could be at least one 2-day BRC gravel round. As this year has already proved doing more than 70km clubman rallies was always plausible, just so long as there was good promotional benefit in the BRC for the competitors to be interested
    Happy doing 100km for the entry fee of a 70km event. The organisers added 30km for free to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the event. Would there have been as many entries if the full entry fee had been charged?

  2. Likes: J4MIE (17th April 2024)
  3. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Herefordshire
    Posts
    536
    Like
    352
    Liked 405 Times in 252 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Boyd View Post
    Happy doing 100km for the entry fee of a 70km event. The organisers added 30km for free to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the event. Would there have been as many entries if the full entry fee had been charged?
    If it’s all down to the entry fee then surely it is sustainable to keep it at 100ish km? One would assume the organisers would be making a loss by not increasing the entry fee, yet this year’s event had 180 entries compared to 119 last year and 139 the year before.

    I would also assume that although getting more entry fees coming in, that with 140 finishers there is a bit of an increase in the cost of repairing the roads. But still, with 61 more entries than last that would cover a lot of the extra cost involved in this year’s running of the event?

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Posts
    11,758
    Like
    490
    Liked 581 Times in 213 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by HKSjbg View Post
    If it’s all down to the entry fee then surely it is sustainable to keep it at 100ish km? One would assume the organisers would be making a loss by not increasing the entry fee, yet this year’s event had 180 entries compared to 119 last year and 139 the year before.

    I would also assume that although getting more entry fees coming in, that with 140 finishers there is a bit of an increase in the cost of repairing the roads. But still, with 61 more entries than last that would cover a lot of the extra cost involved in this year’s running of the event?
    It’s not quite as simple as that. It was a round of all of the top UK championships, that’s the main reason entries were so high. Remember that BRC chops and changed their calendar on a whim the last few years.


    Extra first usage costs - not sure of the figure, maybe £900/mile?
    Extra 2nd usage costs - again maybe £650/mike or something?
    Recce is an extra cost.
    Extra permit fees per car is maybe a few hundred extra?

    But then you have extra costs like rescue crews, doctors, signage, fuel/car costs for officials, etc.

    If it was sustainable, every event would be doing it. All the details I’ve seen was saying it was specific to being the 50th year of the event. I can’t see it being much option in the future or other events, most will make a very modest small profit which will need to tide them over in leaner years.
    If the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •