MentalParadox
26th January 2017, 03:55
It used to be easier, right? Last season I watched start to finish was 2004, and I was only a kid back then (15). All teams on the list were actual car brands, and the system was easy as pie - two drivers per team, add both drivers' points tally to get the manufacturers' points. Highest score wins.
Now, it's 2017 and I feel you need a bloody Masters' degree to understand all those rules and regulations. Allow me to explain my confusion about the constructors' championship for starters:
M-sport (formerly Ford, right?) has 40 points: Ogier has 25 from his win, Tanak 15 from 3rd. This makes sense so far.
Toyota has 24 points: Latvala has 18 points from 2nd, Hanninen scored only 3 points from 3rd on the power stage, as his 16th place gets him no points. 18+3=21. So... 24???
Hyundai has 20 points: Sordo scored 13 points total (including his PS score) and Neuville only brings home his 5 PS points (15th overall, no normal points). To me, that's 18 points... not 20!
Citroën has 10 points... Breen scored those 10 I guess, but what about Lefebre? Isn't he their 3rd driver? The best 2 scores of the team count, right? So why don't Lefebre's 6 points make it 16 for Citroën?
Then there's the drivers' championship. On the WRC broadcast, it showed the final standings. For some reason, WRC drivers and WRC 2 drivers were all thrown in the same ranking, and the WRC 2 guys even scored WRC points... huh?? Aren't those classes supposed to be entirely separate? I can go to the WRC website, and see the WRC 2 rankings, where I see our Norwegian friend whatshisname (sorry, still trying to learn all those new names) got 25 points in the WRC 2 rankings. So... what are those overall points for? If WRC 2 class have their own rankings next to the overall one, why doesn't WRC class?
I tried figuring it all out on my own, but something just doesn't add up.
Now, it's 2017 and I feel you need a bloody Masters' degree to understand all those rules and regulations. Allow me to explain my confusion about the constructors' championship for starters:
M-sport (formerly Ford, right?) has 40 points: Ogier has 25 from his win, Tanak 15 from 3rd. This makes sense so far.
Toyota has 24 points: Latvala has 18 points from 2nd, Hanninen scored only 3 points from 3rd on the power stage, as his 16th place gets him no points. 18+3=21. So... 24???
Hyundai has 20 points: Sordo scored 13 points total (including his PS score) and Neuville only brings home his 5 PS points (15th overall, no normal points). To me, that's 18 points... not 20!
Citroën has 10 points... Breen scored those 10 I guess, but what about Lefebre? Isn't he their 3rd driver? The best 2 scores of the team count, right? So why don't Lefebre's 6 points make it 16 for Citroën?
Then there's the drivers' championship. On the WRC broadcast, it showed the final standings. For some reason, WRC drivers and WRC 2 drivers were all thrown in the same ranking, and the WRC 2 guys even scored WRC points... huh?? Aren't those classes supposed to be entirely separate? I can go to the WRC website, and see the WRC 2 rankings, where I see our Norwegian friend whatshisname (sorry, still trying to learn all those new names) got 25 points in the WRC 2 rankings. So... what are those overall points for? If WRC 2 class have their own rankings next to the overall one, why doesn't WRC class?
I tried figuring it all out on my own, but something just doesn't add up.