Iranian Spies

[Roamy]

So this islams took 3 of our hikers - released one and call the other two spies.

Now the intelligent world knows these people are not spies. They are just common idiots.

So Armedicrap is over here for the UN meeting and I can't figure out why we don't just nab him and do a trade. Oh are you afraid he will never come back :)

[Eki]

Now the intelligent world knows these people are not spies. They are just common idiots.


I'm sure they are from the CIA (Central Idiot Agency).

[Eki]

So Armedicrap is over here for the UN meeting and I can't figure out why we don't just nab him and do a trade. Oh are you afraid he will never come back :)
The US is more likely afraid that Iran doesn't want him back. He's not that important there:


Ahmadinejad told the ABC program "This Week" that his ability to free Bauer and Fattal was limited, and that they will have to face Iranian justice for illegally entering his country.
"I will make a recommendation ... but at the end of the day, they violated the law," Ahmadinejad said in translated remarks.

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/09/19/shourd.arrival/index.html?hpt=T2

For how long does the US detain those who enter the US illegally?

[Roamy]

The US is more likely afraid that Iran doesn't want him back. He's not that important there:



http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/09/19/shourd.arrival/index.html?hpt=T2

For how long does the US detain those who enter the US illegally?

Oh forever plus we don't even lock them up

[Easy Drifter]

Here we give them free medical, housing (real) social assistance etc. and in most cases legal status.
It was recently discovered that 71% of the 'refugees',
many originally illegal, from Siri Lanka afraid for their lives had returned to Siri Lanka for holidays or visits!

[anthonyvop]

Oh forever plus we don't even lock them up

It is funny because it is true.

[Captain VXR]

Since when is 'Iranians' spelt in a Foushto-esque 'Islams'?
Hopefully Ahmandinejad (probably the wrong spelling) will soon be kicked out of power

[glauistean]

Since when is 'Iranians' spelt in a Foushto-esque 'Islams'?
Hopefully Ahmandinejad (probably the wrong spelling) will soon be kicked out of power

The immediate generalization of everything Iran surfaces. The faux name used to insult the idiot Ahmadinejad, a person despised by the educated people of Iran.

If the Mullah's could be disposed of then it would be a much better country.

I'm sitting here and pondering what happened to make Iran change. Why did Peru change? Why did Iraq change? How about El Salvador, Columbia, Chile, Argentina, Bolivia, Grenada, Panama along with so many others.

I wonder who stuck their noses into areas that they had no right to. Hmmmmm

[Bob Riebe]

The immediate generalization of everything Iran surfaces. The faux name used to insult the idiot Ahmadinejad, a person despised by the educated people of Iran.

If the Mullah's could be disposed of then it would be a much better country.

I'm sitting here and pondering what happened to make Iran change. Why did Peru change? Why did Iraq change? How about El Salvador, Columbia, Chile, Argentina, Bolivia, Grenada, Panama along with so many others.

I wonder who stuck their noses into areas that they had no right to. Hmmmmm
Argentina, Chile, Columbia, Grenada, Peru are far better places now than twenty ago, along with many others.
What was your point?

[glauistean]

Argentina, Chile, Columbia, Grenada, Peru are far better places now than twenty ago, along with many others.
What was your point?
I erred naming Colombia ;Columbia. Better now. Bob, you need to read a little as to how they are NOW just getting better. Allende,how did he die, Chile , just now getting out of the hell hole created by the promise of great thing top come by the wonderful (sarcasm) Friedman. A man that nearly destroyed a continent. So the point is Bob.

Before you start with your better than it was twenty years ago is playing semantics and not offering anything to what is said. What was happening in these countries 20 years ago, 10 years ago?

Grenada, you mention that as a badge of honor. Half or more than half of the countries mentioned were left wing prior to being removed by whom. Then what happened?

To write what you just did is like saying that a person with gangrene is now better becuase they have cut off his leg.

[Bob Riebe]

To write what you just did is like saying that a person with gangrene is now better becuase they have cut off his leg.
Only to a moron.

Your rhetoric has no base, try again sparky.

[glauistean]

Only to a moron.

Your rhetoric has no base, try again sparky.

Simplistic, moronic and indicative of your knowledge on social and political substance.

You telegraph your next response. Anyone can see that.

So answer what was written in response instead of your childishness.

[Bob Riebe]

Simplistic, moronic and indicative of your knowledge on social and political substance.

You telegraph your next response. Anyone can see that.

So answer what was written in response instead of your childishness.
You post something that is not based on your fantasy and your posts will not be treated as such.

Your rhetoric is empty bull****e.

Also, again as I said, if you have a point, make it and prove it.

[glauistean]

You post something that is not based on your fantasy and your posts will not be treated as such.

Your rhetoric is empty bull****e.

Also, again as I said, if you have a point, make it and prove it.

As I stated. You telegraph your response. Rhetoric?! I doubt that you even know it's meaning.

A conversation or even a debate with you is impossible because of you immature replies to serious matters.

You lambaste me when I respond and state that what I have posted is bull***e, whatever that is.

Instead of pointing out my errors you attack the writer. For the sake of the forum and this thread, give a cognitive response to what I stated. That is, if you can. Maybe the crux of the matter.

[Bob Riebe]

As I stated. You telegraph your response. Rhetoric?! I doubt that you even know it's meaning.

A conversation or even a debate with you is impossible because of you immature replies to serious matters.

You lambaste me when I respond and state that what I have posted is bull***e, whatever that is.

Instead of pointing out my errors you attack the writer. For the sake of the forum and this thread, give a cognitive response to what I stated. That is, if you can. Maybe the crux of the matter.
I telegraph... hmmm--
telegraph noun
Definition of TELEGRAPH

An apparatus for communication at a distance by coded signals;
especially : an apparatus, system, or process for communication at a distance by electric transmission over wire.
Well I am not on dial-up any more but other than that, what was your point?

You give proof for one of your now vacuous statements and someone may take time to show you the errors of your words; until then it would be a waste of time.

Now give proof how all the countries you list are worse off now than twenty years ago; or at least admit at who you are pointing fingers.

[glauistean]

I telegraph... hmmm--
telegraph noun
Definition of TELEGRAPH

An apparatus for communication at a distance by coded signals;
especially : an apparatus, system, or process for communication at a distance by electric transmission over wire.
Well I am not on dial-up any more but other than that, what was your point?

You give proof for one of your now vacuous statements and someone may take time to show you the errors of your words; until then it would be a waste of time.

Now give proof how all the countries you list are worse off now than twenty years ago; or at least admit at who you are pointing fingers.


Your grasp of the English language is as pathetic as your posts. If you had to look up the definition instead of the euphemism used then it is, I suggest to you leave well enough alone.

You read my post , but so too could a five year old. The difference is, the five year old would understand.

Now, to you and your idiocy I bid you adieu. You are wasting my time and the other members that would like to participate.

[chuck34]

Your grasp of the English language is as pathetic as your posts. If you had to look up the definition instead of the euphemism used then it is, I suggest to you leave well enough alone.

You read my post , but so too could a five year old. The difference is, the five year old would understand.

Now, to you and your idiocy I bid you adieu. You are wasting my time and the other members that would like to participate.

You are pathetic. Not once in at least two threads have you answered one single question. You get all huffy and outraged when anyone dares to question the intellect of "glauistean". No one could possibly have a different view than "glauistean" the great, therefore they must be a stupid, moronic, idiot, redneck who can't read. It's a very old and tired trick to divert the argument so that you do not have to actually back up any of your points.

Now, to you and your idiocy I bid you adieu. You are wasting my time and the other member that would like to PARTICIPATE

[Bob Riebe]

Your grasp of the English language is as pathetic as your posts. If you had to look up the definition instead of the euphemism used then it is, I suggest to you leave well enough alone.

You read my post , but so too could a five year old. The difference is, the five year old would understand.

Now, to you and your idiocy I bid you adieu. You are wasting my time and the other members that would like to participate.
As Mclaughlin says-- BYE, BYE.

[glauistean]

You are pathetic. Not once in at least two threads have you answered one single question. You get all huffy and outraged when anyone dares to question the intellect of "glauistean". No one could possibly have a different view than "glauistean" the great, therefore they must be a stupid, moronic, idiot, redneck who can't read. It's a very old and tired trick to divert the argument so that you do not have to actually back up any of your points.

Now, to you and your idiocy I bid you adieu. You are wasting my time and the other member that would like to PARTICIPATE

Chuck, let's get this out of the way first and foremost. I don't give a damn about what your opinion of me is. The fact is I look at you and this other clown Riebe as being inconsequential.

To state that I have not answered any questions is false. The actual truth is that you and your frenzied uneducated right wingers are unable to argue a point and unable to recognize an answer.

I would bet my last dollar that not one of you could name , without the help of Goggle what happened to their countries over a span of twenty years.

Do you want to allow for the mass executions that occurred during the past twenty years of Argentina with it's popped up Government. How about El Salvador. Get rid of the socialist and install a dictator who sends out death squads to kill the innocents. What about Peru. Shining Path. Fujimori, the installed pne now running away so he can hide from execution.

Then we have Ecuador, Guatemala and Ollie's favorite place, oh yes, and Ronnie's to play with peoples lives and lie about it in order to sell illegal arms to the Contras of Nicaragua.

Is the continent better now than it was twenty years ago? No, it is not. That is a subjective question and one that will take years to see the outcome.

So before you label me with your juvenile ravings and rantings and then using what I have said in order to complete your own inane post, learn what happened twenty years ago and then tell me if you want in a private chat how everything is magically better now than it was then.

[Bob Riebe]

Is the continent better now than it was twenty years ago? No, it is not. That is a subjective question and one that will take years to see the outcome.


Congratulations, you just proved your rhetoric is bs, nice going bunky.

[TOgoFASTER]

You need to understand you are foolishly trying to communicate with a group that worships the wisdom of The Vancome Lady, glauistean.

[chuck34]

Chuck, let's get this out of the way first and foremost. I don't give a damn about what your opinion of me is. The fact is I look at you and this other clown Riebe as being inconsequential.

And that is your problem. You label anyone who disagrees with you as "inconsequential" and treat them with disdane. That only makes you look foolish. And it's great that you don't care what I think about you, doesn't bother me in the least. All I'm saying is that it does your argument much more good if you actually support it rather than attacking those who would question your views. Debate the argument, not the man.


To state that I have not answered any questions is false. The actual truth is that you and your frenzied uneducated right wingers are unable to argue a point and unable to recognize an answer.

Your original point in this thread that Bob questioned was how all those countries listed were better off 20 years ago. To your credit you did almost answer that question. But then went off on yet another rant as to how Bob is a moron. As I asked you in the other thread, just drop the name calling and argue the points.


Do you want to allow for the mass executions that occurred during the past twenty years of Argentina with it's popped up Government. How about El Salvador. Get rid of the socialist and install a dictator who sends out death squads to kill the innocents. What about Peru. Shining Path. Fujimori, the installed pne now running away so he can hide from execution.

Hey there's a response. Was that so hard? I honestly don't know much about Argentina. What do you know about El Salvador beyond the stupid Oliver Stone movie? Shining Path, Fujimori? Both horrible, I condemn them both.


Then we have Ecuador, Guatemala and Ollie's favorite place, oh yes, and Ronnie's to play with peoples lives and lie about it in order to sell illegal arms to the Contras of Nicaragua.

Yep if you want to talk about the arms sale to the Contras, I'll maybe agree with you. It shouldn't have been done, at least not the way that it was.


Is the continent better now than it was twenty years ago? No, it is not. That is a subjective question and one that will take years to see the outcome.

Yep it is subjective. But that didn't stop you from declaring a "NO". Nor did it stop you from railing against Bob for believing things are getting better.


So before you label me with your juvenile ravings and rantings and then using what I have said in order to complete your own inane post, learn what happened twenty years ago and then tell me if you want in a private chat how everything is magically better now than it was then.

I will not tell you that everything is magically better now. Not everything is better now. Some things are better, some are worse. This is the real world where things are shades of gray. Yet you lambast people for thinking that a particular shade of gray is a bit darker (or lighter) than you.

And please stop the name calling. I don't care what you think of me personally. It would be nice to have a conversation/debate without the name calling.