Hoop-98
10th January 2010, 17:29
Taking 250 pounds of drag off the car is the same as 75 HP, at Indy the car really doesn't know the difference.
Now if what Honda said about the RC power is true you can see some possibilities of;
A V6 with out the minimum weight rule should take about 80 pounds off the car. That allows many other components to be lighter, such as clutch, transmission, fuel loads.
If (and I say if as I do not know) we extrapolate all the weight reductions into a 200 pound diet and 625 HP the car would have a P/W ratio of ~2.45 compared to today's car of 2.7.
Today's car had many aero restrictions from the days of chassis competition (such as tunnel exit area), and has a L/D ratio of ~3. With today's technology we could bump that to 3.5 or 3.8 (For Road Course and Short Oval configuration) which would be like a free 100 HP at high speeds.
This could/should result in much better lap times on R/C and short ovals. Possibly the fastest RC car we have ever had.
For the 1.5's the lower power would mean we would need far less wing induced drag, hopefully putting the driver more responsible for speeds.
Now i have no idea if these things will occur, but there is absolutely no technical reason they can't.
I assume the DW guys are a lot more educated in this than I am and I can see some really great technical POSSIBILITIES in this type of formula.
Or it could get screwed up, crossing my fingers.
rh
Now if what Honda said about the RC power is true you can see some possibilities of;
A V6 with out the minimum weight rule should take about 80 pounds off the car. That allows many other components to be lighter, such as clutch, transmission, fuel loads.
If (and I say if as I do not know) we extrapolate all the weight reductions into a 200 pound diet and 625 HP the car would have a P/W ratio of ~2.45 compared to today's car of 2.7.
Today's car had many aero restrictions from the days of chassis competition (such as tunnel exit area), and has a L/D ratio of ~3. With today's technology we could bump that to 3.5 or 3.8 (For Road Course and Short Oval configuration) which would be like a free 100 HP at high speeds.
This could/should result in much better lap times on R/C and short ovals. Possibly the fastest RC car we have ever had.
For the 1.5's the lower power would mean we would need far less wing induced drag, hopefully putting the driver more responsible for speeds.
Now i have no idea if these things will occur, but there is absolutely no technical reason they can't.
I assume the DW guys are a lot more educated in this than I am and I can see some really great technical POSSIBILITIES in this type of formula.
Or it could get screwed up, crossing my fingers.
rh