View Full Version : GermanyÂ’s Motorsport History
JackJason
1st October 2009, 01:53
The following article by Stefanie Gork Ruiz-Herrera (TU Munich) appeared in the September, 2009 issue of Professional Motorsports World.
In the early part of the 20th century, Mercedes was one of the strongest names in the era of OEM-dominated motorsport. In the 1930s this presence was magnified as Mercedes, together with Auto Union (now Audi), successfully met the edict from Hitler, backed up with finance, to export Third Reich sporting success.
Post-World War II, Germany was banned from international competition until 1950. Private entrants did use pre-war BMW engines in single-seater specials in the Formula 2 category but the subsequent re-emergence of the OEMs reabsorbed many of these specialist builders.
Mercedes made a successful F1 re-entry in the mid- 1950s as a manufacturer team, and also had conspicuous success in international sportscar events. The company pulled out of motorsport again due to financial pressure and the bad publicity surrounding the 1955 Le Mans disaster, when a works-run Mercedes went into the crowd, killed 80 people and injured many more.
By the 1960s, the success of the UK industry’s network production system had made OEM in-house motorsport involvement an extremely expensive option. Porsche, for example, found this out to its cost in when it entered F1 as both a chassis and engine manufacturer. Estimates have put Porsche’s financial commitment to an only moderately successful motorsport program at some ten times the expenditure of its successful UK motorsport rivals at the time. A few small specialist German firms did attempt success in Formula One – such as ATS and Rial – but they remained generally uncompetitive, and reliant to a greater or lesser extent on UK-built components and personnel.
It is not until 2001 that Germany saw a revival of single-seat chassis manufacturing based almost entirely upon one company, the Japanese firm Toyota. Toyota Team Europe had, for 30 years, run successful world rallying, and occasional world sportscar, programs from its base in Cologne. In 2001, and with huge financial backing (estimated to be at least $1 billion over five years), Toyota expanded the former rally team into a fully fledged F1 chassis and engine-building organization.
In contrast, German OEMs had maintained a Formula One presence through the provision of engines to specialist (UK) chassis constructors. Following Renault’s introduction of the turbocharged engine in the mid-1970s, BMW built engines for Brabham and Porsche for McLaren.
Germans OEMs have found great success in motorsport since the 1960s in international formulae below the specialized arena of F1. Porsche, for example, has achieved outstanding success in sportscar events, particularly Le Mans, and, likewise, BMW has won countless championships in national and international saloon car racing.
Audi, currently part of the VAG Group, is another German OEM with a strong history of motorsport success in the lower professional categories of motorsport. Its parent company was the former Auto Union, famed for pre-war sporting success in Grand Prix racing. After a long post-war gap from competition, in the 1980s the company successfully rewrote the technical rules in rallying with its four-wheel-drive rally car, the Quattro, which went on to gain much success. The four-wheel-drive aspect of this success soon became a part of the Audi “brand” that the company successfully exported to other aspects of motorsport, particularly national saloon car racing in many different countries. Audi has recently dominated long-distance sportscar racing and in 2006 won Le Mans, using a diesel engine for the first time. VAG enjoyed reflected success when their UK-based Bentley subsidiary won Le Mans at its third attempt – resulting in huge global publicity and an enormous growth in sales, which has not diminished since.
An interesting and well written article :D
Saint Devote
1st October 2009, 05:28
Porsche a marque I am intimately familiar with, did not achieve only moderate success. It won world championships with Alain Prost, Niki Lauda and Mclaren through TAG.
In 1982 the sound of the Porsche engined Mclarens was unique because you could hear the turbo whistling!! And German company KKK's turbos ought to have a place and a mention in this.
Porsche has an amazing record with its iconic cars such as the wonderful 917 and the number 23 917 that won Le Mans for the first time in 1970. And these cars can all be viewed in the new Porsche museum at Weissach.
Then the 936's and 956 cars - still the prettiest and most special of long distance racing cars with its Rothman livery. [sigh - the memories].
Another contribution has been the air cooled beetle engine that was a mainstay for so many in road and off-road racing. Formula Vee was a great formula and drivers like Lauda and Rosberg [Super Vee] cut their teeth on it.
Lauda, one of my alltime favorite people in racing, had his helmet painted red because he thought it would be easily visible by emergency workers if he crashed into the forests at the Nurburgring while he was racing Formula Vee.
Niki has such a marvellous sense of humer - love it!!! Heard the one about his reply to tourists that saw him at the Nurburgring?
They asked him what he was doing at the Bergwerk corner whjere he crashed and he answered that he was searching for his ear! LOL!!!!
Quintessential Lauda - the only driver I know of that gave his trophies away after he was presented with them at the grand prix!
Valve Bounce
2nd October 2009, 05:59
Porsche a marque I am intimately familiar with, did not achieve only moderate success.
Then how come you didn't know they never achieved much as a manufacturer? Be careful you don't dislocate your elbow while patting yourself on the back - it might hurt. :eek:
Saint Devote
3rd October 2009, 03:24
Then how come you didn't know they never achieved much as a manufacturer? Be careful you don't dislocate your elbow while patting yourself on the back - it might hurt. :eek:
Cheeky huh? You waste a message on criticism again? Whats the matter with you?
Porsche manufacturered engines that won championships in f1 and long distance racing sports cars and did win the French Grand Prix.
They manufactured racing cars that won championships as well as Le Mans.
:rolleyes: You consider this nothing?!
How come you add NOTHING to this thread. Given the subject is there not a solitary person here that can offer additional comment on Germany's motorsport? Pathetic.
Josti
3rd October 2009, 03:37
Porsche manufacturered engines that won championships in f1 and long distance racing sports cars and did win the French Grand Prix.
They manufactured racing cars that won championships as well as Le Mans.
Plus they won the Dakar Rally, twice, but that's hardly an achievement is it Saint Devote...
Valve Bounce
3rd October 2009, 08:45
Cheeky huh? You waste a message on criticism again? Whats the matter with you?
Porsche manufacturered engines that won championships in f1 and long distance racing sports cars and did win the French Grand Prix.
They manufactured racing cars that won championships as well as Le Mans.
:rolleyes: You consider this nothing?!
How come you add NOTHING to this thread. Given the subject is there not a solitary person here that can offer additional comment on Germany's motorsport? Pathetic.
In this forum, before your arrival, F1 manufacturers were regarded as the teams which manufacturer chassis like Frank Williams, McLaren, Ferrari etc while those people who supplied engines were regarded as engine suppliers.
Nothing cheeky about my post - I just don't like braggarts.
Vitesse
3rd October 2009, 20:16
I read the Porsche reference as pertaining purely to their 1961-62 effort: in that respect it's accurate.
Less accurate is the oft-repeated claim that MB withdrew from racing due to the Le Mans disaster: at least this writer acknowledges the real reason, which was cost. MB's withdrawal had already been announced before Le Mans.
Saint Devote
4th October 2009, 03:49
Plus they won the Dakar Rally, twice, but that's hardly an achievement is it Saint Devote...
:D indeed, hardly!!
Saint Devote
4th October 2009, 04:02
In this forum, before your arrival, F1 manufacturers were regarded as the teams which manufacturer chassis like Frank Williams, McLaren, Ferrari etc while those people who supplied engines were regarded as engine suppliers.
Nothing cheeky about my post - I just don't like braggarts.
Well you can include or exclude whoever you want - but the truth remains, reality makes it evident, that Porsche IS a manufacturer of sports cars and MANUFACTURED racing engines and racing cars that have won championships. And THAT IS called success.
Secondly, a team like Williams is not a manufacturer, they are CONSTRUCTORS or as Ferrari called them garagistes, which is why the formula 1 CONSTRUCTORS championship is so named because it includes everyone.
And what goddam bragging are you referring to? - this like nursery school.
How come the posters here that have posted billions of messages are all so cantankerous and bitchy??
blito
4th October 2009, 09:34
Cant beat a good bit of bitchiness! TBH, it seems to me that after a while of reading and posting, ones mind becomes crammed with alsorts of info and we become "picky" about facts - a bit like school nerds arguing every last detail from their top-trumps cards as if it were life-and-death important!
My take on the "manufacturers" thing -
Manufacturer = car company that makes and sells products for normal road use.
Constructor = entrant/team/builder of track-specific cars.
So, Porsche would be a Manufacturer that have dabbled in various racing programmes over the last 60 years with varying degrees of success. Pretty much like most other manufacturers TBH.
BTW JackJason , great article, thanks for sharing :)
Valve Bounce
4th October 2009, 10:15
And what goddam bragging are you referring to? - this like nursery school.
How come the posters here that have posted billions of messages are all so cantankerous and bitchy??
Sorry, you will have to ask yourself that. I'm not going to risk getting a ban.
D-Type
5th October 2009, 00:19
Saint D,
If you read the first post again, you will appreciate that when the writer says "when it entered F1 as both a chassis and engine manufacturer", she is clearly referring to the 1961-62 seasons and not to the later TAG-funded turbo engine, and certainly not to the performance of Porsche cars outside Formula 1. She later goes on to say " Germans OEMs have found great success in motorsport since the 1960s in international formulae below the specialized arena of F1. Porsche, for example, has achieved outstanding success in sportscar events, particularly Le Mans, and, likewise, BMW has won countless championships in national and international saloon car racing." which reinforces the point.
Re-read the article and you will find that it is not about Porsche as such but about German industry as a whole.
Saint Devote
5th October 2009, 01:55
Cant beat a good bit of bitchiness! TBH, it seems to me that after a while of reading and posting, ones mind becomes crammed with alsorts of info and we become "picky" about facts - a bit like school nerds arguing every last detail from their top-trumps cards as if it were life-and-death important!
:) what a wonderfully so-very English summation.
Saint Devote
5th October 2009, 01:58
Saint D,
If you read the first post again, you will appreciate that when the writer says "when it entered F1 as both a chassis and engine manufacturer", she is clearly referring to the 1961-62 seasons and not to the later TAG-funded turbo engine, and certainly not to the performance of Porsche cars outside Formula 1. She later goes on to say " Germans OEMs have found great success in motorsport since the 1960s in international formulae below the specialized arena of F1. Porsche, for example, has achieved outstanding success in sportscar events, particularly Le Mans, and, likewise, BMW has won countless championships in national and international saloon car racing." which reinforces the point.
Re-read the article and you will find that it is not about Porsche as such but about German industry as a whole.
:o You are correct - well other than that :D !!!
Saint Devote
5th October 2009, 02:06
Sorry, you will have to ask yourself that. I'm not going to risk getting a ban.
It is really improper behavior and dishonest to cast aspersions as you have done towards me and, then you act coy when challenged.
This is serious misbehavior that ought to have you banned as well.
You have my disrespect over this :(
Valve Bounce
5th October 2009, 02:45
It is really improper behavior and dishonest to cast aspersions as you have done towards me and, then you act coy when challenged.
This is serious misbehavior that ought to have you banned as well.
You have my disrespect over this :(
I think it best for me not to reply to your post. That way, I stay inside the forum guidelines and rules.
52Paddy
5th October 2009, 03:08
The following article by Stefanie Gork Ruiz-Herrera (TU Munich) appeared in the September, 2009 issue of Professional Motorsports World.
In the early part of the 20th century, Mercedes was one of the strongest names in the era of OEM-dominated motorsport. In the 1930s this presence was magnified as Mercedes, together with Auto Union (now Audi), successfully met the edict from Hitler, backed up with finance, to export Third Reich sporting success.
Post-World War II, Germany was banned from international competition until 1950. Private entrants did use pre-war BMW engines in single-seater specials in the Formula 2 category but the subsequent re-emergence of the OEMs reabsorbed many of these specialist builders.
Mercedes made a successful F1 re-entry in the mid- 1950s as a manufacturer team, and also had conspicuous success in international sportscar events. The company pulled out of motorsport again due to financial pressure and the bad publicity surrounding the 1955 Le Mans disaster, when a works-run Mercedes went into the crowd, killed 80 people and injured many more.
By the 1960s, the success of the UK industry’s network production system had made OEM in-house motorsport involvement an extremely expensive option. Porsche, for example, found this out to its cost in when it entered F1 as both a chassis and engine manufacturer. Estimates have put Porsche’s financial commitment to an only moderately successful motorsport program at some ten times the expenditure of its successful UK motorsport rivals at the time. A few small specialist German firms did attempt success in Formula One – such as ATS and Rial – but they remained generally uncompetitive, and reliant to a greater or lesser extent on UK-built components and personnel.
It is not until 2001 that Germany saw a revival of single-seat chassis manufacturing based almost entirely upon one company, the Japanese firm Toyota. Toyota Team Europe had, for 30 years, run successful world rallying, and occasional world sportscar, programs from its base in Cologne. In 2001, and with huge financial backing (estimated to be at least $1 billion over five years), Toyota expanded the former rally team into a fully fledged F1 chassis and engine-building organization.
In contrast, German OEMs had maintained a Formula One presence through the provision of engines to specialist (UK) chassis constructors. Following Renault’s introduction of the turbocharged engine in the mid-1970s, BMW built engines for Brabham and Porsche for McLaren.
Germans OEMs have found great success in motorsport since the 1960s in international formulae below the specialized arena of F1. Porsche, for example, has achieved outstanding success in sportscar events, particularly Le Mans, and, likewise, BMW has won countless championships in national and international saloon car racing.
Audi, currently part of the VAG Group, is another German OEM with a strong history of motorsport success in the lower professional categories of motorsport. Its parent company was the former Auto Union, famed for pre-war sporting success in Grand Prix racing. After a long post-war gap from competition, in the 1980s the company successfully rewrote the technical rules in rallying with its four-wheel-drive rally car, the Quattro, which went on to gain much success. The four-wheel-drive aspect of this success soon became a part of the Audi “brand” that the company successfully exported to other aspects of motorsport, particularly national saloon car racing in many different countries. Audi has recently dominated long-distance sportscar racing and in 2006 won Le Mans, using a diesel engine for the first time. VAG enjoyed reflected success when their UK-based Bentley subsidiary won Le Mans at its third attempt – resulting in huge global publicity and an enormous growth in sales, which has not diminished since.
An interesting and well written article :D
Nice one J :up:
AAReagles
9th October 2009, 00:31
... Niki has such a marvellous sense of humer - love it!!! Heard the one about his reply to tourists that saw him at the Nurburgring?
They asked him what he was doing at the Bergwerk corner whjere he crashed and he answered that he was searching for his ear! LOL!!!!
Quintessential Lauda - the only driver I know of that gave his trophies away after he was presented with them at the grand prix!
:up: :up:
Lauda is another driver who is overlooked too often, even on this forum I noticed.
Your mentioning of his humorous response reminds me of an ancient thread we had on here, many RAMS ago, before the (necessary) upgrade on this cyber space community erased it. :(
Sure was quite a bit of witty expressions made by drivers over various generations. Too bad someone hasn't made a book of it.
Saint Devote
9th October 2009, 01:32
:up: :up:
Lauda is another driver who is overlooked too often, even on this forum I noticed.
Your mentioning of his humorous response reminds me of an ancient thread we had on here, many RAMS ago, before the (necessary) upgrade on this cyber space community erased it. :(
Sure was quite a bit of witty expressions made by drivers over various generations. Too bad someone hasn't made a book of it.
Lauda is from a generation of drivers - no entourages, no whining, no crying.
When a plane from his airline crashed, Boeing tried to pin the responsibility on him. They did not know Lauda - he proved it was a technical fault.
His wanting to punch the priest when being given the last rites when he was critically injured is a favorite story!
AAReagles
14th October 2009, 22:13
Lauda is from a generation of drivers - no entourages, no whining, no crying... His wanting to punch the priest when being given the last rites when he was critically injured is a favorite story! :laugh: Good story, I was unaware of that.
Indeed, his type of character (integrity) has been deeply missed considering the pre-madonnas having evolved in greater proportions within the sport for the past two decades or so.
Don Capps
2nd February 2011, 17:03
I read the Porsche reference as pertaining purely to their 1961-62 effort: in that respect it's accurate.
Less accurate is the oft-repeated claim that MB withdrew from racing due to the Le Mans disaster: at least this writer acknowledges the real reason, which was cost. MB's withdrawal had already been announced before Le Mans.
The only question regarding the Daimler involvement in motor racing for the 1956 season regarded the sports car effort, the Grand Prix effort already slated for being closed down at the end of the season -- although the door did remain slightly open for a possibly reduced effort for 1956. The Le Mans incident really affected only the fate of the sports car program that was being considered for 1956, eliminating that possibility. The financial issues and the need for those involved in the racing program to either return to or join the effort centered on the introduction of a new series of automobiles for the 1958/1959 timeframe was the impetus behind shutting down the racing department. That Daimler had achieved its purpose was simply icing on the cake.
The engine that Porsche built for TAG for McLaren was strictly a customer job, the company not having anything to do with TAG or McLaren outside providing literally what the customer ordered. Although Porsche built the engine, it was first and foremost a effort undertaken by TAG. In doing this, it was much along the lines of what Cosworth did for Ford, Ilmor for Mercedes or Chevrolet, and so forth.
The Porsche effort for the 718/2 series and the 804, in retrospect, seems not only snakebit, but also as barking up the wrong tree, the effort to stick with air-cooling the engine being a nice idea, but doomed when competing against the competition it was then facing. Also, it is interesting to note that Porsche was about the last to abandon the use of drum brakes in GP racing.
Interesting to note that Borgward is not mentioned, even in passing, given that it did have its brief moment in the sun during the latter part of the Fifties.
BDunnell
2nd February 2011, 18:18
Interesting to note that Borgward is not mentioned, even in passing, given that it did have its brief moment in the sun during the latter part of the Fifties.
And let's not forget that it was in part in a Borgward that one of the leading British preparers of his day, Bill Blydenstein, made his racing name.
Don Capps
9th February 2011, 16:19
An interesting aspect of German motor sport history is that the occasion of the Coupe Internationale (AKA the "Gordon Bennett Cup") in June 1904 resulted in the formation of the Association Internationale des Automobile Clubs Reconnus (AIACR) which changed its name to the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile after the conclusion of World War II.
Another interesting tidbit of the German racing past that has attracted much attention, perhaps far exceeding its actual importance, is the mythology that Alfred Neubauer helped create -- largely with the help of others who kept repeating it over and over and over without taking any effort to question its validity -- surrounding the use of silver rather than white for the color for the Daimler-Benz effort when it returned to Grand Prix racing in 1934. Despite there even being a symposium held by Daimler in July 2007 to discuss the matter, some still persist in thinking that the Neubauer mythology is true -- including some at Daimler unfortunately.
Using materials from the Daimler archives along with just the plain, simple business of historical inquiry, it is clear that the Mercedes W25 did not appear for either the AVUSrennen or the Eifelrennen in any color but silver. The entire legend about the white paint of the cars being stripped to "make weight," that is, get under the 750 kilogram maximum weight for the new Formule Internationale that went into effect that season, seems to be sort of harmless, retroactive story that was concocted for whatever reason by Neubauer.
In and of itself, the myth that Neubauer created and which was then proliferated and perpetuated by many others may seem to be rather small potatoes, but it is an excellent case study as to how automobile racing history can be distorted when non-historians are at the helm when it comes to how that history is passed on. When a few historians began to question the Neubauer story, the reaction was rather interesting, there being those who were interested in the quest, while others simply sat back and observed. I am still somewhat surprised -- perhaps perplexed and amazed would be better terms to use -- that there are still those who continue to believe and support the Neubauer mythology despite all the evidence to the contrary. Alas, as I mentioned, this includes several at Daimler, as witness the nonsense that their PR people put out regarding the paint scheme for the MB F1 machine last season. Of course, there is still a very strong element within the motor racing community to not let facts get in the way of a good story.
Oh, the Auto-Union Typ 1934 machines were always silver, by the way, just to add a bit of perspective to this issue. Plus, the labels "Type A", "Type B," "Type C," and "Type D" were applied retroactively to the Auto-Union machines during the immediate post-WW2 period and were not used concurrently while the cars were being campaigned.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.