Rollo
17th June 2008, 00:31
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/theroyalfamily/2122182/Britain-should-get-rid-of-the-monarchy%2C-says-UN.html
The UN Human Rights Council said the UK must "consider holding a referendum on the desirability or otherwise of a written constitution, preferably republican".
The council has 29 members including Saudi Arabia, Cuba and Sri Lanka.
It was the Sri Lankan envoy who raised concerns over the British monarchy.
The resulting report said Britain should have a referendum on the monarchy and the need for a written constitution with a bill of rights.
I have two words for the UN and the second one is "off".
Apart from the fact that the UN itself was created out of the ashes of the bloodiest conflict that the world has ever seen, and that the UK itself was one of the founders, it appears as though the UN has not done its research.
No bill of rights? Um, not only are there the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Scottish Claim of Right 1689 (Scot), the UK is also signatory to the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948.
And as for the call that the UK needs a constitution? The England has been stable since the period of the Commonwealth and the UK from about 1701 (or 1801) except for the Irish Question.
Someone needs to give the UN a right boot up the date and a fist of fives.
The UN Human Rights Council said the UK must "consider holding a referendum on the desirability or otherwise of a written constitution, preferably republican".
The council has 29 members including Saudi Arabia, Cuba and Sri Lanka.
It was the Sri Lankan envoy who raised concerns over the British monarchy.
The resulting report said Britain should have a referendum on the monarchy and the need for a written constitution with a bill of rights.
I have two words for the UN and the second one is "off".
Apart from the fact that the UN itself was created out of the ashes of the bloodiest conflict that the world has ever seen, and that the UK itself was one of the founders, it appears as though the UN has not done its research.
No bill of rights? Um, not only are there the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Scottish Claim of Right 1689 (Scot), the UK is also signatory to the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948.
And as for the call that the UK needs a constitution? The England has been stable since the period of the Commonwealth and the UK from about 1701 (or 1801) except for the Irish Question.
Someone needs to give the UN a right boot up the date and a fist of fives.